Bug 456025
Summary: | On some systems device names are not shown | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Huffman <bloch> |
Component: | lsscsi | Assignee: | Dan HorĂ¡k <dan> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | bcling, rtresidd |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-21 10:57:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Adam Huffman
2008-07-20 23:04:18 UTC
Interesting that you mention "some" machines. It's been all machines (2.6.25 kernel) for me. The releases prior to 0.21 didn't fix this problem, but it's fixed now. This should be considered a trivial update: * 0.21 compiles, installs and runs fine from the source rpm on the project's main web page. * There are no Red Hat specific patches in the 0.17 spec file. * Tested on x86_64. What do we need to do to make this happen? I can confirm that a rebuild of the upstream .src.rom fixes the problem. I'll make a rebuilt package available on my fedorapeople space. This still hasn't been repackaged into Fedora 10... I've been running 0.21 for the last few months without issue - can we get this addressed? Any chance of getting this back ported into FC9 also.. As this problem is present there. I've had to rebuild an external 0.21 source package to get this going. Adam you said you placed a rebuild on your fedorapeople space?? I can't seem to find it at verdurin.fedorapeople.org. ?? I grabbed to srpm from here.. http://sg.danny.cz/scsi/lsscsi.html and built for x86_64. All seems to be working fine. Cheers Richard lsscsi-0.21-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lsscsi-0.21-2.fc10 lsscsi-0.21-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lsscsi-0.21-2.fc9 lsscsi-0.21-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lsscsi-0.21-2.fc8 lsscsi-0.21-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lsscsi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9419 lsscsi-0.21-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lsscsi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9489 lsscsi-0.21-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. lsscsi-0.21-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. lsscsi-0.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |