Bug 456301

Summary:	Firefox about:config 'void warranty' page NEEDS TO GO AWAY
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Component:	firefox	Assignee:	Jonathan Blandford <jrb>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4.7	CC:	ddumas, gecko-bugs-nobody
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-20 13:30:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	456254
Bug Blocks:

Description Ben Levenson 2008-07-22 17:59:31 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #456254 +++

Description of problem:
Firefox about:config 'void warranty' page NEEDS TO GO AWAY; it's not
professional, and it was added relatively recently.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firefox-3.0.1-1.el5

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to about:config
  
Actual results:
Might void warranty warning (see attached screenshot)

Expected results:
No such warning! If there must be a warning, it should not mention a warranty.

Additional info:
This is not professional, and thus not good for an enterprise product!

-- Additional comment from shillman on 2008-07-22 10:34 EST --
Created an attachment (id=312349)
Screenshot


-- Additional comment from benl on 2008-07-22 13:57 EST --
set 'general.warnOnAboutConfig' to false

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2008-10-31 16:38:12 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 8 Karsten Wade 2011-12-14 03:49:52 UTC

Removing myself for these bug components as I'm either no longer involved in that aspect of the project, or no longer care to watch this particular bug. Sorry if you are caught in a maelstrom of bug changes as a result!

Comment 9 Karsten Wade 2011-12-14 03:57:41 UTC

Removing myself for these bug components as I'm either no longer involved in that aspect of the project, or no longer care to watch this particular bug. Sorry if you are caught in a maelstrom of bug changes as a result!

Comment 11 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 13:30:54 UTC

Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. 
Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.