Bug 456678
Summary: | Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Vrabec <pvrabec> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dan Horák <dan> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | dan:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-08-12 13:06:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Vrabec
2008-07-25 14:47:28 UTC
formal review is here, please read the notes bellow OK source files match upstream: e827ada394aff91f9c539cee35e946e81152426c arpd-0.2.tar.gz 342cc53e8d23c84ecb91c7b66c6e93e7ed2a992a honeyd-1.5c.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. BAD dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. BAD license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. BAD compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. BAD package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). ?? debuginfo package looks complete. ?? rpmlint is silent. ?? final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - you should standardize on using one of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - you should add the %dist tag - arpd is licensed under BSD, so the right license tag is "GPLv2+ and BSD" - missing BR: readline-devel, zlib-devel - aprd doesn't build on 64-bit platforms (it checks for libevent and libpcap only in ${prefix}/lib and checks for static lib only) - CFLAGS are reset to "" in configure.in Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd-1.5c-4.fc9.src.rpm next turn :) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd-1.5c-5.fc9.src.rpm even better formal review of the last revision: OK source files match upstream: e827ada394aff91f9c539cee35e946e81152426c arpd-0.2.tar.gz 342cc53e8d23c84ecb91c7b66c6e93e7ed2a992a honeyd-1.5c.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: honeyd Short Description: Honeypot daemon Owners: pvrabec Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. |