Bug 457672

Summary: ON_DEV missing from status field definition on help page
Product: [Community] Bugzilla Reporter: Sterling Winter <sterling.winter>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Noura El hawary <nelhawar>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.2CC: nelhawar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-04 16:27:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to remove REPOENED status and add ON_DEV to status docs dkl: review+

Description Sterling Winter 2008-08-03 09:40:28 UTC 
On the help page there should be an entry describing the ON_DEV status:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status

Also, the REOPENED entry there may be superfluous since that particular status doesn't appear in the status selector box on the advanced bug search page.
Comment 1 Noura El hawary 2008-08-03 10:38:44 UTC 
Thanks for reporting this issue, yeah true the ON_DEV is missing in the docs, and the REOPENED status is not there anymore basically CLOSED bug can now be changed directly to ASSIGNED with adding the keywork "Reopened" to the bug.

Will submit a fix for that with the next package update.

Noura
Comment 2 Noura El hawary 2008-08-03 10:40:20 UTC 
Created attachment 313288 [details]
patch to remove REPOENED status and add ON_DEV to status docs

Hi Dave ,, 

this is a patch to fix the status documentation. Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Noura
Comment 3 David Lawrence 2008-08-04 03:28:32 UTC 
Comment on attachment 313288 [details]
patch to remove REPOENED status and add ON_DEV to status docs

Looks good to me.
Comment 4 Noura El hawary 2008-08-04 16:27:28 UTC 
Thanks for the review Dave, committed to cvs
Comment 5 Sterling Winter 2008-08-04 17:33:32 UTC 
"This bug is undergoing integration testing in dev."

It would be helpful to (non-developer) end users to explain exactly what "in dev" means -- that's merely a circular definition of ON_DEV. Also, on a help page you should avoid using abbreviations such as "dev" as they can be ambiguous.