| Summary: | Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rakesh Pandit <rpandit> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Rahul Sundaram <sundaram> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, smohan, sundaram |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | sundaram:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-09-06 07:56:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Rakesh Pandit
2008-08-14 18:19:43 UTC
There is absolutely no mention of anything license-related in the source code. All we have is the upstream web site, but it's been long enough since this has come up that I don't recall if that's sufficient. While I ask the right people, could you ask upstream to at least mention "GPLv3" somewhere in their code, and if possible to actually follow the suggestions in the GPL and put a copy of it in the tarball/zip and the proper license block in the code? http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/issues/detail?id=2 Informed upstream. Waiting for response. http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/issues/detail?id=1 I have confirmed about version here. Confirmed upstream, that it is GPLv3. A license block will shortly be on scripts. My patch for license block has been applied upstream: http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/source/detail?r=6 http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/source/browse/trunk/txt2rss Updated SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/txt2rss.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/txt2rss-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm I haven't done a scratch build but otherwise looks sane. The only problem I see is the lack of the license text within the package. You MUST include a copy of the license. This is recommended by the guidelines and mandated by the GPL license Also as a recommendation, we need a man page. Thanks, I have reported upstream that they should include license file in there source. http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/issues/detail?id=4 Upstream has confirmed that it will be included ASAP. I do not consider these issues as blockers but rather in a SHOULD list. between I have added a man page and submitted it upstream as well. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/txt2rss.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/txt2rss-0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: txt2rss Short Description: Convert from txt to rss Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. txt2rss-0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/txt2rss-0.1-3.fc9 txt2rss-0.1-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/txt2rss-0.1-3.fc8 txt2rss-0.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. txt2rss-0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |