Bug 459225

Summary: networkmanager doesn't handle static routes properly
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Craig Schlenter <craig>
Component: NetworkManagerAssignee: Dan Williams <dcbw>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: dcbw, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-19 05:03:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Craig Schlenter 2008-08-15 07:23:02 UTC
Description of problem:

nm-tool lists static routes correctly as entered in nm-connection-editor but the actual routes are added with a gateway of 0.0.0.0 rather than the gateway specified. This is for a wired interface btw. but it probably doesn't matter.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0-0.9.4.svn3675.fc9.i386
NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.9.4.svn3675.fc9.i386
NetworkManager-gnome-0.7.0-0.9.4.svn3675.fc9.i386

How reproducible:

Add some static routes in nm-connection-editor. Check that they are correct with nm-tool. Then run /sbin/route and you'll see the gateway entry is wrong.
  
Actual results:

0.0.0.0 for gateway

Expected results:

Correct gateway IP in route

Comment 1 Dan Williams 2008-08-15 16:05:33 UTC
Can you try svn3930 from f9-updates-testing?  That will (a) add a route to the gateway specified via the interface, and (b) add the static route you specify via that gateway.

Comment 2 Craig Schlenter 2008-08-18 04:41:16 UTC
Hi Dan

Thanks for the quick response. Do you have a url handy where I can grab that from please? All the normal methods (yum, directly hitting downloads.fedora and looking in koji which seems to be down) have have failed. I'm guessing this is still part of the 'infrastructure issues' sitation...

Thanks!

Comment 4 Craig Schlenter 2008-08-19 05:03:08 UTC
Seems to work now ... Yay! Thank you.

I've changed the status to CLOSED/ERRATA ... hope that's right.