Bug 459703

Summary: Requires libkcal.so.2 which is not provided by a current package
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Douglas E. Warner <silfreed>
Component: kipi-pluginsAssignee: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: gauret, ltinkl, mgarski
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-21 14:28:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Douglas E. Warner 2008-08-21 14:17:09 UTC 
Description of problem:
Installing kipi-plugins from updates requires libkcal.so.2 which is not provided by any current packages.


$ sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install kipi-plugins
[..]
Setting up Install Process                                                          
Parsing package install arguments                                                   
Resolving Dependencies                                                              
--> Running transaction Check
---> Package kipi-plugins.x86_64 0:0.1.5-2.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libkcal.so.2()(64bit) for package: kipi-plugins
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
kipi-plugins-0.1.5-2.fc9.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: libkcal.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package kipi-plugins-0.1.5-2.fc9.x86_64(updates)
Error: Missing Dependency: libkcal.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package kipi-plugins-0.1.5-2.fc9.x86_64 (updates)

$ repoquery --whatprovides libkcal.so.2
kdepim-libs-6:3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
kdepim-libs-6:3.5.9-10.fc9.i386

$ rpm -q kdepim-libs
kdepim-libs-4.1.0-2.fc9.x86_64
Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2008-08-21 14:28:21 UTC 
kdepim(4) isn't provided by fedora (umm... maybe kde-redhat/unstable? :) )
Comment 2 Douglas E. Warner 2008-08-21 14:35:17 UTC 
Yeah; sorry about that.  I was thinking "kde4" and not "kdepim4".  Thanks!