Bug 460306

Summary:	Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Marek Mahut <mmahut>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Michal Fabry <mfabry>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, lkundrak, mfabry, notting
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-11-13 04:20:42 EST	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Marek Mahut 2008-08-27 10:07:48 EDT

Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flickrfs/flickrfs.spec
SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flickrfs/flickrfs-1.3.9-1.fc8.src.rpm
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=788713

Description: Flickrfs is a virtual filesystem which mounts on your linux
machine like any other partition. Once mounted, it retrieves
information about your photos hosted on your flickr account,
and shows them as files. You can now easily copy photos from
your local machine to this mount, and it will automatically
upload them to your flickr account. Similary, you can copy
the files from your mount to your local machine,
and it will download your images from flickr.

Comment 1 Michal Fabry 2008-08-27 10:20:08 EDT

I'll take it.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-27 11:53:59 EDT

Note that all the other fuse packages are named 'fuse-whatever'... so it might be better to name this 'fuse-flickerfs' (with a Provides: flickerfs perhaps).

Comment 3 Marek Mahut 2008-11-13 04:20:42 EST

This piece of software is very unstable and I'm not comfortable enough to be responsible having it in Fedora. Closing this review, if anyone wants to make another try please open a new review request and mark this bug as duplicate.