Bug 460361

Summary:	libopensync-plugin-synce.noarch should be arched
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Hasan Ceylan <hceylan>
Component:	libopensync-plugin-synce	Assignee:	Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-03-27 19:42:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Hasan Ceylan 2008-08-27 19:20:30 UTC

This plugin installs files under /usr/lib/opensync-1.0/python-plugins.

Where as opensync is arched and on x86_64 platforms look for those files under /usr/lib64/opensync-1.0/python-plugins folder

Therefore the plugin is not found.

Meanwhile the wiki at http://www.synce.org/moin/SynceSetup/OpenSync suggests an older version of the plugin which makes things more confusing.

Thus I think this rpm should be arched.

Regards,
Hasan Ceylan

Comment 1 Hasan Ceylan 2008-08-27 21:18:11 UTC

I wanted to check back the information I got...

The setup did not completely worked. The phone numbers did not get synchronized.

I had a chat session on the #synce IRC channel and apparently that is a known issue. Shuffling different version of the rpms did not help either.

I was instructed to use 0.22 release of libopensync on the IRC as 0.3X series were never considered as stable and inherently had a lot of bugs. Yet I think, Fedora had to go with the upgrade to unstable versions as the evolution-data-server dependency (I only guess).

Now, lastly I found out that the opensync is about to make a release by September the 1st. 

I think rawhide should upgrade to that version when it is out.

On the other hand, I was told by synce developers that "the current synce version should be compatible with a little modification if not as is"...

If all that information is already known, sorry for bugging, if not hope that it helps,

Regards,

Ceylan

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 02:52:47 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping