Bug 461045
Summary: | Segfault in openoffice when clicking on a URL | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> |
Component: | gnome-vfs2 | Assignee: | Ondrej Holy <oholy> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | dmalcolm |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-02 13:20:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dave Malcolm
2008-09-03 16:28:01 UTC
This is the same issue as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=410381 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84676 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416571 it is technically workaround-able in OpenOffice.org (which I did for 3.0) by basically disabling the use of gnome-vfs2 for any uris which would bring the copy of the neon implementation inside gnome-vfs2 into the process space, as the public symbols of libhttp.so mixed up instead with samely named symbols of system neon as used by OOo for some other purposes But the real problem is that an app linking to neon will work unreliably if it also uses gnome-vfs2, i.e. all the symbols listed in nm -D /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so | grep ne_ should not be public symbols, and/or renamed so that a gnome-vfs2 using app can also use libneon safely Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in the last planned RHEL5 minor release. This Bugzilla will soon be CLOSED as WONTFIX. To request that Red Hat re-consider this request, please re-open the bugzilla via appropriate support channels and provide additional business and/or technical details about its importance to you. Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in RHEL5 stream. If the issue is critical for your business, please provide additional business justification through the appropriate support channels (https://access.redhat.com/site/support). |