Bug 461327
| Summary: | Django 1.0 Released | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Steve Milner <smilner> |
| Component: | Django | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | esm, marco.crosio |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2008/sep/03/1/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-09-25 00:00:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Steve Milner
2008-09-05 21:47:19 UTC
They sure move fast. Sure thing about co-maintaining, just apply for the ACLs you want over at pkgdb? Django-1.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Django-1.0-1.fc9 Django-1.0-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Django-1.0-1.fc8 Django-1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update Django'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7777 Django-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update Django'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7901 (In reply to comment #1) > They sure move fast. Sure thing about co-maintaining, just apply for the ACLs > you want over at pkgdb? Requested via pkgdb. Django-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Django-1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Ouch, 1.0 is backwards-incompatible with 0.96; wouldn't it have been a good idea to hold off until F10 for this? This certainly isn't something I was expecting to see, and I suspect others might be surprised by it as well. More information on porting from 0.96 (the previous release in F8 and F9) and 1.0: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.0-porting-guide/ "Django 1.0 breaks compatibility with 0.96 in some areas." Anyone who just updated blindly bought themselves more than a few minutes with that documemnt. Uh yes. That probably would have been (In reply to comment #9) > Ouch, 1.0 is backwards-incompatible with 0.96; wouldn't it have been a good > idea to hold off until F10 for this? This certainly isn't something I was > expecting to see, and I suspect others might be surprised by it as well. In hindsight, you're probably right. I was weighing off between F8 going EOL with a Django prerelease (albeit stable) and pushing backward-incompatible changes to users. Given that the development team still backport changes all the way back to 0.95, staying with 0.96 might have been better. Well, now that the cat is out of the bag, as a test sample of size 1, would you prefer a downgrade back to 0.96 (which requires every subsequent Django package to be epoch-bumped), a Django096 compatibility RPM for 0.96 users, or install Django 0.96 from tarball? Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience. |