Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: daap-sharp - DAAP client library for Mono|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Ian Burrell <ianburrell>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, lemenkov, michel, notting|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-03-24 15:13:10 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Ian Burrell 2008-09-07 16:32:12 EDT
This is a re-review of an orphaned package. Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/daap-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/daap-sharp-0.3.5-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: daap-sharp is a DAAP (Digial Audio Access Protocol) implementation. It is used by Apple's iTunes software to share music.
Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2008-09-08 01:06:04 EDT
Seems that it's already in Fedora http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/daap-sharp/
Comment 2 Ian Burrell 2008-09-10 16:59:43 EDT
(In reply to comment #1) > Seems that it's already in Fedora > > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/daap-sharp/ It was in Fedora. It got orphaned and removed around Fedora 7. It needs a re-review to be restored.
Comment 3 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-09-22 13:12:19 EDT
Straightforward review, since the package has already been approved, so these are just clean-up requests. rpmlint: daap-sharp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 10) Easiest fix is to open the file in Emacs, select all, then M-x untabify Package builds OK, but on my system that has monodoc installed, it generates some files that are currently unpackaged: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/monodoc/sources/daap-sharp-docs.source /usr/lib64/monodoc/sources/daap-sharp-docs.tree /usr/lib64/monodoc/sources/daap-sharp-docs.zip These won't be generated by Koji since monodoc is not installed there, but would you consider adding a BR and packaging them, perhaps in a -doc subpackage?
Comment 4 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-09-22 14:04:07 EDT
Fails on ppc64, not sure if it's transient or not, but you might want to take a look. If it's replicable you might want to ExcludeArch ppc64 and file a tracking bug (or reuse the Mono ppc64 tracking bug) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=836708
Comment 5 Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-10-10 09:20:39 EDT
Comment 6 Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-03-24 15:13:10 EDT
Closing due to lack of response