Bug 462235
Summary: | Nautilus crash @ startup "Nautilus can't be used now, due to an unexpected error" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stephen Warren <swarren> |
Component: | nautilus | Assignee: | Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | bloch, iglesias, mattwilkens, red, tbzatek, tsmetana |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-08 21:41:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stephen Warren
2008-09-14 17:14:23 UTC
Additional notes: * This happens at initial login, not unlock after hibernate. * It isn't "always", instead it's "often". * I believe this is a regressions that appeared as part of the updates since the F9 security outage; i.e. the last week or so. I don't recall seeing this before then. That said, hibernate worked before then, so perhaps I wasn't logging in from scratch so much. In the past couple of days I've seen this on two systems running Rawhide. The only other message shown when starting nautilus from the terminal is: ** (nautilus:4020): WARNING **: Unable to add monitor: Not supported Yes, this still continually happens to my wife on F9. I'm seeing this behaviour on a system I upgraded from F8 to F9 with the Unity respin 20081004 DVD. As Stephen noted, it doesn't happen every time I log in, but it's pretty close to every time. This bug happens even more often in F10. I'm noticing it on almost any machine I upgraded (about 15 up to now). bug 462235 and this should be merged. Sorry. I meant bug 238227 Marking duplicate of 238227. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 238227 *** |