Bug 462621

Summary:	Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ruben Kerkhof <ruben>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, fschwarz, notting
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-01-19 13:39:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ruben Kerkhof 2008-09-17 15:34:00 UTC

Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec
SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.7-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
RSA-PSS-SHA256 signatures, ECDSA(1363)/EMSA1(SHA-256) signatures,
SHA-256 hashes, and AES-CTR encryption

Comment 1 Brian Pepple 2008-11-16 22:43:26 UTC

MD5Sum:
94dce03471b0fbc0392cc76de207c234  pycryptopp-0.5.7.tar.gz

Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Upstream source tarball verified
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* Package builds in Mock.
* Package installs and uninstalls cleanly

Bad:
* rpmlint produces the following errors:
pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/cipher/aesmodule.cpp
pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/hash/sha256module.cpp
pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/rsamodule.cpp
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/hash/sha256.so 0775
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_sha256.py 0644
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/ecdsa.so 0775
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/rsa.so 0775
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/cipher/aes.so 0775
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_ecdsa.py 0644
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_rsa.py 0644
pycryptopp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/test/test_aes.py 0644
pycryptopp.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycryptopp/publickey/ecdsamodule.cpp

Comment 2 Ruben Kerkhof 2009-01-19 13:39:18 UTC

I've been working with upstream for a while now to build pycryptopp againsts the cryptopp library provided by Fedora, instead of the cryptopp source that is shipped with pycryptopp.

We've bumped into an issue between C++ and python, and so far haven't found a solution.

I'll close this bug for now.