Bug 462668

Summary:

PDF: inconsistent numbering for ulinks and footnotes

Product:

[Community] Publican

Reporter:

Murray McAllister <mmcallis>

Component:

publican

Assignee:

Jeff Fearn <jfearn>

Status:

CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

QA Contact:

Michael Hideo <mhideo>

Severity:

medium

Docs Contact:

Priority:

medium

Version:

2.0

CC:

jfearn, mmcallis, publican-list, vdanen

Target Milestone:

---

Keywords:

Documentation

Target Release:

---

Hardware:

All

OS:

Linux

Whiteboard:

Fixed In Version:

0.39

Doc Type:

Bug Fix

Doc Text:

Story Points:

---

Clone Of:

Environment:

Last Closed:

2008-11-18 20:35:23 EST

Type:

---

Regression:

---

Mount Type:

---

Documentation:

---

CRM:

Verified Versions:

Category:

---

oVirt Team:

---

RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Cloudforms Team:

---

Attachments:

Description	Flags
page 5, wrong numbering	none
page 19, wrong numbering	none

Description Murray McAllister 2008-09-17 22:09:04 EDT

Description of problem:
Numbering for ulinks and footnotes are inconsistent.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client release 5.2 (Tikanga)
* publican-0.37-0.el5
* publican-fedora-0.15-0.el5
* fop-0.95-0.2.beta1.rh1.el5
* saxon-6.5.5-1jpp.3.el5
* java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.15-1jpp.2.el5
* evince-0.6.0-8.el5
* Firefox 3.0.1 <http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/>

How reproducible:
Always for the book mentioned below.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. "svn co http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/selinuxguide"
2. "cd selinuxguide/community/trunk/SELinux_User_Guide; make html-en-US; make pdf-en-US"
  
Actual results:
In this example, the counting for ulinks and footnotes is reset after each chapter (makes sense). There are a few instances where this is not the case, and the numbering is off.

PDF:

* see the last bullet point on page 5, "Risk report: Three years of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4[910]". This is a ulink followed by a footnote. It should be [8]. See pdf0.png

See the bottom of page 19: "Managing Software with yum[23]". [23] should be [1]. The footnote with [23] is numbered [3] instead of [23] or [1]. See pdf1.png

Screenshots taken from evince-0.6.0-8.el5

Expected results:
Number to be consistent (or at least no allowed to go up to [900]).

Additional info:
Same results when viewed with Adobe Reader.

<http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/funny-pictures-kitten-looks-for-bugs-in-your-computer.jpg>

Comment 1 Murray McAllister 2008-09-17 22:10:00 EDT

Created attachment 317025 [details]
page 5, wrong numbering

Comment 2 Murray McAllister 2008-09-17 22:10:44 EDT

Created attachment 317026 [details]
page 19, wrong numbering

Comment 3 Jeff Fearn 2008-09-17 22:31:03 EDT

The issue here is that there isn't a space or comma between the two numbers.

e.g.

On page 5: link 9 is for the ulink, link 10 is for the footnote.
On page 19: link 2 is for the ulink, link 3 is for the footnote.

I'm not sure this is a practice we wish to support. Assigning to the great Editor in Chief for his input.

Comment 4 Jeff Fearn 2008-11-18 17:39:55 EST

This bug affects other uses of multiple references at the same location. 

compare 'Table 3.1. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Kernels' on page  16 of http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Hardware_Certification/5.2.2/pdf/Policy_Guide/Policy_Guide.pdf page 

to 

http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Hardware_Certification/5.2.2/html/Policy_Guide/sect-Policy_Guide-Hardware_Certification_Policies-Software_Policies.html#form-Policy_Guide-Software_Policies-Kernels

Comment 5 Jeff Fearn 2008-11-18 20:35:23 EST

Resized footnote ref number and added padding to prevent numbers collapsing together.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 21:57:00 EST

publican-0.39-0.fc9, publican-fedora-0.16-0.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.