Bug 463393
| Summary: | [LTC 6.0 FEAT] 200303:ADTools Oprofile Java Profiling Enhancements | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> |
| Component: | oprofile | Assignee: | William Cohen <wcohen> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Petr Muller <pmuller> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | ejratl, ohudlick, pmuller, snagar |
| Target Milestone: | alpha | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | 6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | s390x | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | oprofile-0.9.6-4.el6 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-11-10 21:18:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 606308 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 356741, 554559 | ||
|
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2008-09-23 04:20:22 UTC
comes via upstream package, therefore no code attach to feature BZ set to submitted ------- Comment From lxie.com 2009-09-10 01:49 EDT-------
Georg,
Should this be accepted? It was marked accepted in the devtrack.
- Linda
> comes via upstream package, therefore no code attach to feature BZ
> set to submitted
>
OProfile 0.9.4 and newer have support for Java. The main thing is making sure that the package is built with support. For RHEL 5 some header files needed to be included so that OProfile could be built with the JVMTI support. JVMPI support has been deprecated for over 5 years and will not be support. Is the existing RHEL-5u4 oprofile-0.9.4-11.el5 java jvmti support sufficient? If JVMTI support on s390 is sufficient, then this can get a dev ack. ------- Comment From gmuelas.com 2009-09-24 09:27 EDT------- (In reply to comment #7) > OProfile 0.9.4 and newer have support for Java. The main thing is making sure > that the package is built with support. For RHEL 5 some header files needed to > be included so that OProfile could be built with the JVMTI support. JVMPI > support has been deprecated for over 5 years and will not be support. > > Is the existing RHEL-5u4 oprofile-0.9.4-11.el5 java jvmti support sufficient? > > If JVMTI support on s390 is sufficient, then this can get a dev ack. > Yes, OProfile JIT support with JVMTI is sufficient. ------- Comment From mgrf.com 2010-06-21 09:26 EDT------- Feature test results in bug report RHBZ 606308 - oprofile-jit: libjvmti_oprofile.so is not built that has been flagged DUP to 463223 - [LTC 6.0 FEAT] 200979:Java Support support for OProfile 1.) Expect fix with with oprofile-0.9.6-6 -> hopefully in snap7 2.) with one issue still in work === from RHBZ 463223 ======== William Cohen 2010-06-07 12:09:41 EDT I tracked the problem down to a missing "-a1" on the %setup. The oprofile-0.9.6-6 has been built with the fix. Still need to address the /usr/share/oprofile/stl.pat. The differs between ppc and ppc64 (same also on s390). This file is part of the oprofile rpm, so one might make the argument that only one version be installed. However, still should avoid files that are differ due to arch in /usr/share. ------- Comment From mgrf.com 2010-08-02 03:50 EDT------- This feature is verified on R6 snapshots Set feature to "verified" Thx Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0 is now available and should resolve the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of CURRENTRELEASE. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. |