Bug 463764
Summary: | Package review: perl-Module-Manifest | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Matěj Cepl <mcepl> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mcepl, notting, paul | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mcepl:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-09-29 10:02:03 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 463763 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Marcela Mašláňová
2008-09-24 16:04:42 UTC
+ GOOD: rpmlint is silent on both source and binary package. + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - BAD: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs there is no email address in %changelog -- all required formats of the changelog record include email address + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + GOOD: LICENSE file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 3612558b4f285315d7c36668df96f254 Module-Manifest-0.03.tar.gz + MUST: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=842686 + MUST: noarch, so it compiles everywhere. + MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + MUST: no libraries + MUST: not relocatable + MUST: A package owns all directories that it creates. Follows perl guidelines. + MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. + MUST: Each package have a %clean section. + MUST: Each package consistently use macros. + MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. + MUST: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + MUST: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + MUST: No header files. + MUST: No static libraries. + MUST: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix. + MUST: No devel packages. + MUST: No .la libtool archives. + MUST: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + MUST: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + MUST: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + SHOULD: Includes license text. Attaching patch for the SPEC file -- when this is applied, APPROVED. Created attachment 317622 [details]
patch against the .spec file fixing the issues
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Module-Manifest Short Description: simple utility module for Module::Inspector Owners: mmaslano Branches: rawhide InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list cvs done. Could we have branches of this package for all currently-supported EPEL releases please? This module works perfectly well all the way back to RHEL-3. I would be happy to maintain the older branches if you're not interested in them. I ask this so that I don't need to conditionalize inclusion of perl(Test::DistManifest) in my own packages, where I try to remain compatible with older release where possible. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Manifest New Branches: el4 el5 el6 Owners: pghmcfc InitialCC: perl-sig [ I hope these are all EPEL branches, which you need. I created this request as reply on previous Paul's comment. ] Yes, thanks. Git done (by process-git-requests). perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el5 perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el6 perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el4 Hi Marcela, the EPEL builds are all done; can you add buildroot overrides for them in bodhi with no expire date please (they should expire automatically when the updates are pushed to stable I believe). I can't do it myself as I don't have commit access to the devel branch. Done. perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. perl-Module-Manifest-1.08-5.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. |