Bug 463817
Summary: | gfs_fsck can't decide which bitmap to fix | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Nate Straz <nstraz> | ||||
Component: | gfs-utils | Assignee: | Robert Peterson <rpeterso> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | cfeist, edamato, jkortus | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-02 11:01:18 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Nate Straz
2008-09-24 19:54:55 UTC
Created attachment 317723 [details]
Patch to fix the problem
This patch was tested and found to fix the problem.
We needed to do a va_start every time we go through the query loop,
otherwise our arguments are left in an undefined state.
Easy fix; requesting flags for inclusion into 5.4 or 5.3. if management decides to go that route. I pushed the fix to the master and STABLE2 branches of our cluster git tree. Waiting for flags before doing the RHEL5 branch. I pushed the patch to the RHEL5 branch of the cluster git tree now for inclusion into 5.4. Changing status to Modified. verified with gfs-utils-0.1.20-1.el5 part of gfs_fsck output: Fix bitmap for block 85? (y/n) x Bad response, please type 'y' or 'n'. Fix bitmap for block 85? (y/n) An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1336.html |