Bug 463912

Summary: Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Balint Cristian <cristian.balint>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, lkundrak, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: lkundrak: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-05 07:18:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Balint Cristian 2008-09-25 10:50:07 UTC
Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/tinyows.spec
SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/tinyows-0.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm

Description:
TinyOWS server implements latest WFS-T standard versions,
as well as related standards such as Filter Encoding (FE).

Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2008-09-25 12:37:32 UTC
The summary line has a typo (same as the description did here, in bz).

Comment 2 Balint Cristian 2008-09-25 12:52:24 UTC
Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/tinyows.spec
SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/tinyows-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm

* Thu Sep 25 2008 Balint Cristian <rezso> - 0.6.0-2
- shorter summary description

Comment 3 Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-04 12:35:44 UTC
1.) Why do you throw away the valgrind run results?

make %{?_smp_mflags} valgrind || true

2.) This can be replaced

%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/*

with

%{_datadir}/%{name}

and this

pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
   ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml config.xml
popd

with

ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config.xml

Sorry -- I could not resist these; just because I found nothing severe ;)
None of these is anything that would block the review:

APPROVED

Comment 4 Balint Cristian 2009-01-04 12:45:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1.) Why do you throw away the valgrind run results?
> 
> make %{?_smp_mflags} valgrind || true


- My behaviour is to trow it, but _allways_ look at build logs.
I am unsure if on ppc64 will fail some tests (always an issue), 
if so than I complicate my life. Olso i prepare for alpha
sparc/sparc64 and i can see some failures wich stop rpm build
process.

> 
> 2.) This can be replaced
> 
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/*
> 
> with
> 
> %{_datadir}/%{name}
> 

- will NEXTRELEASE

> and this
> 
> pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
>    ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml config.xml
> popd
> 
> with
> 
> ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config.xml
>

- will NEXTRELEASE

> Sorry -- I could not resist these; just because I found nothing severe ;)
> None of these is anything that would block the review:

I must Thanks for the patient and meticulous review !
 
> APPROVED

Comment 5 Balint Cristian 2009-01-04 12:49:15 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: tinyows
Short Description: WFS-T and FE implementation server
Owners: rezso
Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 20:11:41 UTC
F-8 branches are no longer accepted. 

cvs done for the rest.