Bug 463912
| Summary: | Review Request: tinyows - WFS-T and FE implementation server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Balint Cristian <cristian.balint> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, lkundrak, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lkundrak:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-05 07:18:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Balint Cristian
2008-09-25 10:50:07 UTC
The summary line has a typo (same as the description did here, in bz). Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/tinyows.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/tinyows-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Sep 25 2008 Balint Cristian <rezso> - 0.6.0-2 - shorter summary description 1.) Why do you throw away the valgrind run results?
make %{?_smp_mflags} valgrind || true
2.) This can be replaced
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/*
with
%{_datadir}/%{name}
and this
pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml config.xml
popd
with
ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config.xml
Sorry -- I could not resist these; just because I found nothing severe ;)
None of these is anything that would block the review:
APPROVED
(In reply to comment #3) > 1.) Why do you throw away the valgrind run results? > > make %{?_smp_mflags} valgrind || true - My behaviour is to trow it, but _allways_ look at build logs. I am unsure if on ppc64 will fail some tests (always an issue), if so than I complicate my life. Olso i prepare for alpha sparc/sparc64 and i can see some failures wich stop rpm build process. > > 2.) This can be replaced > > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* > > with > > %{_datadir}/%{name} > - will NEXTRELEASE > and this > > pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ > ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml config.xml > popd > > with > > ln -s ../../../%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.xml > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config.xml > - will NEXTRELEASE > Sorry -- I could not resist these; just because I found nothing severe ;) > None of these is anything that would block the review: I must Thanks for the patient and meticulous review ! > APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tinyows Short Description: WFS-T and FE implementation server Owners: rezso Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel F-8 branches are no longer accepted. cvs done for the rest. |