Bug 465155
| Summary: | system-config-firewall prevents f10 beta installation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christoph Höger <choeger> |
| Component: | system-config-firewall | Assignee: | Thomas Woerner <twoerner> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | twoerner |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-10-02 09:48:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Christoph Höger
2008-10-01 20:31:28 UTC
The mo files are in the main and the sub-package, but they are from the same build and also identical. Therefore there should not be a file conflict at all. The content and even the file flags are the same. Installing the packages with yum and also with rpm itself does not result in file conflicts for me. Can you please verify which packages and versions you are using? That bug disappeared with a new try. I assume it was an incompatible package from rawhide which I had enabled. I assume that is an anaconda regression, because deactivating rawhide did not change anything. |