Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||symlinks for man pages accidently created in /usr/bin|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Christian Krause <chkr>|
|Component:||groff||Assignee:||Stepan Kasal <kasal>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-11-07 05:53:35 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Christian Krause 2008-10-05 04:44:47 EDT
Created attachment 319492 [details] patch for groff spec file to fix the problem Description of problem: The symlinks for some man pages (e.g. gpic.1.gz) are accidently created in /usr/bin instead of /usr/share/man/man1/ . Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): groff-184.108.40.206-15 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. install groff 2. try "man gpic" 3. ls -la /usr/bin/gpic* Actual results: no manual found for gpic (should be the same as for pic) gpic.1.gz symlink in /usr/bin Expected results: symlinks for man pages should be in /usr/share/man/man1 Additional info: The problem is caused by a typo in the spec file, I've attached a patch to fix it.
Comment 1 Christian Krause 2008-11-06 08:49:30 EST
*ping* Any news regarding this issue? Is there anything more I can do to help to fix this problem?
Comment 2 Till Maas 2008-11-06 18:09:58 EST
(In reply to comment #1) > *ping* > Any news regarding this issue? Is there anything more I can do to help to fix > this problem? This has been fixed in groff-220.127.116.11-16.fc10 which will be in F10 Everything. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1019 It set this to ASSIGNED, because no further triaging needs to be done. Probably this can be closed, unless some also wants to push an update for F9 (it this bug is present there, too).
Comment 3 Christian Krause 2008-11-07 05:53:35 EST
Thank you very much. I'd like to confirm that groff-18.104.22.168-16.fc10.i386 fixes the problem for F10. The most recent package in F9 is groff-22.214.171.124-14.fc9.i386 which doesn't have this problem. So everything seems to be fine in F9 and F10 and so I'm suggesting to close this bug with the resolution RAWHIDE. (Btw: would it be OK if I as the reporter close the bug?)