Bug 465933

Summary: nhfsstone does not support NFSv3 and v4
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Tatsuo Kawasaki <kawasaki>
Component: nfs-utilsAssignee: Steve Dickson <steved>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Martin Jenner <mjenner>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.2CC: jscotka, pbenas
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-02 10:03:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 475627    
Attachments:
Description Flags
support nfsv3 and v4 patch none

Description Tatsuo Kawasaki 2008-10-07 08:12:15 UTC
Created attachment 319622 [details]
support nfsv3 and v4 patch

Description of problem:
The nhfsstone does not reply (hang up) if nfs verion is NFSv3 or NFSv4. The current nhfsstone utility *only* support NFS v2 because the nhfsstone open /proc/net/rpc/nfs and read 'proc2' line. The 'proc2' line is used by NFS v2.

Success: mount nfs filesystem with -o nfsvers=2 and run nhfsstone.
Fail   : mount nfs filesystem (nfsv3 or v4) and run nhfsstone.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
All versions.

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  mount [some directory]  and run nhfsstone 
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Case 2: hang up.

Expected results:
Show report.

Additional info:
I add new option [-2|-3|-4] like nfsstat.)

Comment 3 Steve Dickson 2009-04-29 20:18:31 UTC
Fixed in nfs-utils-1.0.9-42.el5

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 10:03:25 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1321.html