Bug 466807

Summary: google fork to support ipv6, for fedora 11
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: acount closed by user <a1459440>
Component: ipvsadmAssignee: Matthias Saou <matthias>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: matthias, poelstra
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/ipvs.html#kernel-2.6
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.25-1 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-24 15:31:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description acount closed by user 2008-10-13 18:17:57 UTC
I think that the kernel bits are alredy included into 2.6.27

-thanks-

Comment 1 acount closed by user 2008-10-13 18:20:03 UTC
*** Bug 466805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 John Poelstra 2008-10-17 22:51:23 UTC
What is bug or RFE here?  2.6.27 is already in rawhide.

Comment 3 acount closed by user 2008-10-18 22:49:00 UTC
RFE , ipvsadm needs the google hacks to handle ipv6 (kernel side included into 2.6.27 or .28-git) : http://sixpak.org/vince/google/ipvsadm/?C=M;O=D

Comment 4 acount closed by user 2008-11-09 12:02:36 UTC
IPv6 load balancing: http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/IPv6_load_balancing

Comment 5 Matthias Saou 2008-12-22 18:51:23 UTC
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/ipvs.html

From what can be read now, 1.25 has been released by upstream now, but requires a kernel more recent than the one currently in devel. I'll prepare the updated package in CVS nevertheless, but will build and push later.

Comment 6 Matthias Saou 2008-12-24 15:31:27 UTC
I've tested 1.25 on my Fedora 10 system and it worked fine (I only tested IPv4), so I'm pushing the build to devel as it seems like it won't break anything even until the right kernel gets in.