Bug 466992
Summary: | NFS-ISO installs fail in Fedora 10 Beta | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bryan Stillwell <bryan.stillwell> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Chris Lumens <clumens> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Bryan Stillwell <bryan.stillwell> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | adaora.onyia, anaconda-maint-list, dcantrell, doug.chapman, nphilipp, rick.hester |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-10-15 17:07:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bryan Stillwell
2008-10-14 22:16:16 UTC
Everything you're seeing here is intentional. What's going on is that the loader is looking for the install.img file and you haven't told it where it is via the stage2= parameter. Thus loader goes out looking for it in this order: (1) Try to find it via stage2=, then (2) Look for it on any attached CDs, then (3) Infer a location based on method= or repo=. That's what you are seeing in the log file. Additionally there's been a slight change in NFSISO as well where we no longer look inside the ISO images for the install.img. It now needs to be located elsewhere. You can either boot up with the boot.iso to provide the install.img or you can place it in images/ at the same directory level as your ISO images. (In reply to comment #1) > Additionally there's been a slight change in NFSISO as well where we no longer > look inside the ISO images for the install.img. It now needs to be located > elsewhere. You can either boot up with the boot.iso to provide the install.img > or you can place it in images/ at the same directory level as your ISO images. Can you tell me why it is this way? Have there been unsurmountable problems with using the images.img from the ISOs contained in the NFS directory? (In reply to comment #2) > Can you tell me why it is this way? Have there been unsurmountable problems > with using the images.img from the ISOs contained in the NFS directory? No, there weren't insurmountable problems. However, we are trying to separate the install.img and the packages to be installed more. The reason for this is so anaconda is not tied so tightly to installing any particular version of a product. In order to reinforce this idea a little, we've done things like add the repo= and stage2= parameters, make the loader only look for install.img instead of also validating the repo, and not look inside ISO images for the install.img. |