Bug 467413 (mingw32-fontconfig)

Summary: Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: berrange, fedora-package-review, michel, notting, pbrobinson
Target Milestone: ---Flags: pbrobinson: fedora‑review+
dennis: fedora‑cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: 2.6.0-9.fc10 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-16 15:52:28 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 454410, 467396, 467405, 489353    
Bug Blocks: 467419    

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 08:03:30 EST
Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/fontconfig/mingw32-fontconfig.spec
SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-7.fc11.src.rpm

* Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> - 2.6.0-7
- Requires pkgconfig.

* Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> - 2.6.0-6
- Use _smp_mflags.
- Rebuild libtool configuration.
- More BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires.
Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2009-02-18 08:36:54 EST
The SRPM URL is invalid, I presume that's because -8 has replaced it.
Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2009-02-18 09:02:55 EST
Mostly OK except that it fails to build due to lack of mingw32-expat and I don't see a mingw32-expat package review. Maybe its been missed.

One other small one is that the patch line should prob use the named option. EG %patch0 -p1 -b .remove-logfile or similar.

+ rpmlint output

$ rpmlint -i mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-8.fc11.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license

+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
ab54ec1d4ddd836313fdbc0cd5299d6d  fontconfig-2.6.0.tar.gz
- package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tested using koji scratch build

  Failing due to lack of mingw32-expat

+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr
n/a package owns all directories it creates
n/a no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8


n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
- reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
Comment 5 Peter Robinson 2009-02-27 06:52:40 EST
Any update on a review request for mingw32-expat?
Comment 6 Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-03-09 11:49:36 EDT
ping. The missing mingw32-expat review request is blocking fontconfig -> pango -> gtk2 -> gtkvnc
Comment 7 Richard W.M. Jones 2009-03-09 14:33:17 EDT
mingw32-expat (bug 489353) has now been reviewed
and is in the process of being imported to CVS.
Comment 8 Peter Robinson 2009-03-09 18:52:41 EDT
I'm approving this as once the mingw32-expat hits rawhide it will build and its not option for the review.

Comment 9 Richard W.M. Jones 2009-03-10 03:15:09 EDT
New Package CVS Request
Package Name: mingw32-fontconfig
Short Description: MinGW fontconfig library
Owners: rjones berrange
Branches: F-10 EL-5
Comment 10 Dennis Gilmore 2009-03-10 16:16:32 EDT
CVS Done
Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2009-03-13 15:26:56 EDT
mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2009-03-16 15:52:23 EDT
mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.