Bug 467541
| Summary: | Openal Soft alternative request | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Juan Manuel Borges Caño <juanmabc3> | ||||
| Component: | openal | Assignee: | Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 11 | CC: | andreas.bierfert, genixpro, gilboad, lfarkas, linuxdonald, milan.slanar | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| URL: | http://kcat.strangesoft.net/openal.html | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-12-26 14:53:09 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Juan Manuel Borges Caño
2008-10-18 08:49:26 UTC
Created attachment 320740 [details]
My current openal-soft spec.
Hello, this spec shows my progress.
I can have both openal and openal-soft installed but openal-devel conflicts with openal-soft-devel so in this state the user haves to select what to install for development. The good is that packages compiled for openal can be installed and executed.
$ rpm -q openal openal-devel openal-soft openal-soft-devel
openal-0.0.9-0.15.20060204cvs.fc9.i386
package openal-devel is not installed
openal-soft-1.5.304-0.1.fc9.i386
openal-soft-devel-1.5.304-0.1.fc9.i386
$ rpm -ql openal
/etc/openalrc
/usr/lib/libopenal.so.0
/usr/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.0
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9/NOTES
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9/README
/usr/share/doc/openal-0.0.9/TODO
$ rpm -ql openal-soft
/usr/bin/openal-info
/usr/lib/libopenal.so.1
/usr/lib/libopenal.so.1.5.304
/usr/share/doc/openal-soft-1.5.304
/usr/share/doc/openal-soft-1.5.304/COPYING
$ rpm -ql openal-soft-devel
/usr/include/AL
/usr/include/AL/al.h
/usr/include/AL/alc.h
/usr/include/AL/alext.h
/usr/lib/libopenal.so
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/openal.pc
$ ldd /usr/bin/blender.bin | grep -i openal
libopenal.so.0 => /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 (0x00111000)
Lets tackle this for F11 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I agree with this change. I started development on a piece of software using OpenAL. Completely legitimate uses of the API caused crashes, and there would be a thread dead-lock inside of openal every time the program closes using the routines that the openal reference says should be used. Also, when it would work for the duration of the program, the audio would come out scratchy, sometimes it would come out at a higher tempo then it should, there is quite a variety to the buggy results that I would get. valgrind indicates that the openal library is making numerous memory errors. The OpenAL distributed with fedora is both out of date and very buggy. When I replaced it with openal-soft that I compiled myself, all of these problems where alleviated, and the program worked perfectly instantly. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Here is my openal-soft package but it´s in review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Whats about to replace the openal lib with the openal-soft lib? what about the libopenal.so.0 lib which is not provided any libs in f12? libopenal.so.0 is not needed in F12 because all packages are compiled with openal-soft. When you have problems with an package from fedora please post the package name here. |