Bug 467813
Summary: | Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Uday Prakash <uprakash> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, herrold, notting, tjb |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-07-05 16:57:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449, 467814 |
Description
Uday Prakash
2008-10-21 01:24:24 UTC
The package should be named with python in the name, I guess along python-rendition-common I renamed the RPM to python-rendition-common. Renamed Spec URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/python-rendition-common.spec Renamed SRPM URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/python-rendition-common-0.9.2-1.src.rpm I don't see that you're a member of the packager group, so I've indicated that you need a sponsor. This package does build fine, but: Source0: should be a complete URL that can be used to download the package. Following the URL to the upstream site gets me a pile of expired certificate notices and finally a microsoft IIS page telling me I don't have permission to access the page. The same happens for any access to www.renditionsoftware.com. Hmm, 3.5 months since I wrote that with no reply. I know this sat for some time, and I didn't do a full review, but it would be nice to at least see a reply to my comment. Nobody wants to do a review of a package where the submitter isn't responding, and eventually it will just end up being closed. I check www.renditionsoftware.com again and while it now actually responds (and is running CentOS instead of IIS), the URL is still invalid and I can find no mention of this particular piece of software. No response; closing. |