Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Uday Prakash <uprakash>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, herrold, notting, tjb|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-07-05 12:57:13 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||201449, 467814|
Description Uday Prakash 2008-10-20 21:24:24 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/rendition-common.spec SRPM URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/rendition-common-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: The rendition-common package contains the necessary shared libraries for running many Rendition applications and utilities.
Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2008-10-21 03:34:33 EDT
The package should be named with python in the name, I guess along python-rendition-common
Comment 2 Uday Prakash 2008-10-21 19:17:49 EDT
I renamed the RPM to python-rendition-common. Renamed Spec URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/python-rendition-common.spec Renamed SRPM URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/python-rendition-common-0.9.2-1.src.rpm
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2009-03-07 12:33:50 EST
I don't see that you're a member of the packager group, so I've indicated that you need a sponsor. This package does build fine, but: Source0: should be a complete URL that can be used to download the package. Following the URL to the upstream site gets me a pile of expired certificate notices and finally a microsoft IIS page telling me I don't have permission to access the page. The same happens for any access to www.renditionsoftware.com.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:22:02 EDT
Hmm, 3.5 months since I wrote that with no reply. I know this sat for some time, and I didn't do a full review, but it would be nice to at least see a reply to my comment. Nobody wants to do a review of a package where the submitter isn't responding, and eventually it will just end up being closed. I check www.renditionsoftware.com again and while it now actually responds (and is running CentOS instead of IIS), the URL is still invalid and I can find no mention of this particular piece of software.
Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-05 12:57:13 EDT
No response; closing.