Bug 467893
Summary: | Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Honza 'thingie' Bartoš <thingie> |
Component: | ghc | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | bos, haskell-devel, loupgaroublond, petersen |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-19 14:49:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Honza 'thingie' Bartoš
2008-10-21 15:28:46 UTC
Oh dear this is hard to fix and due to bad packaging: ghc682-prof should obsolete ghc-prof with version: unfortunately I don't see any way to fix this other than upgrading to f10, but the next f9 update of ghc may help to circumvent this since we're dropping ghc68X subpackaging. (In reply to comment #1) > but the next f9 update of ghc may help to > circumvent this since we're dropping ghc68X subpackaging. No sorry that is nonsense. Other than pushing a new ghc682 build (which is pretty much a wasted effort) I can see any good way to resolve this. You could add system config to yum to ignore ghc682-prof to workaround around it (or uninstalled ghc-prof if that is an option). Sorry. > Other than pushing a new ghc682 build [...] I can['t] see any good way to resolve this.
And of course unfortunately it is not possible since ghc682 does not rebuild on f9. :-(
Okay I have an idea: perhaps for f9 we should just name the new ghc-prof-6.8.3 subpackage ghc683-prof instead to workaround this or maybe it is better to just add a dummy ghc682-prof package to keep yum quiet, otherwise we will break upgrades to f10 or need to update ghc for f10 to obsolete ghc683-prof. Hopefully ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 should fix this. ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9388 ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc gtk2hs haddock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9388 ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |