Bug 468009

Summary: [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction!
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ankit Patel <ankit>
Component: glibcAssignee: Pravin Satpute <psatpute>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 10CC: drepper, i18n-bugs, jakub, psatpute, swkothar
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-02 07:17:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch created against glibc devel branch for Gujarati Collation fix none

Description Ankit Patel 2008-10-22 10:57:22 UTC 
Description of problem:
Character "ળ" (0AB3) needs to be sorted after the character "હ" (0AB9)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora rawhide!

How reproducible:
Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create folders with the name starting from the character (0AB3) and (0AB9)
2. Sort them using simple "sort by name" method
3. Check the order of the folders sorted
  
Actual results:
Folder names starting with (0AB3) is sorted before folder names starting with (0AB9)

Expected results:
Folder names starting with (0AB3) should be sorted after folder names starting with (0AB9)

Additional info:
Comment 1 Ankit Patel 2008-10-22 11:01:44 UTC 
Here is the standard sorting order defined by Gujarati Community: http://www.indlinux.org.in/wiki/index.php/GujaratiSort
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 04:07:04 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 3 Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-30 17:07:07 UTC 
Pravin, is this assertion correct?  If yes, this should be an easy fix, right?
Comment 4 Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 09:35:27 UTC 
sorry, 
i was waiting for foss.in collation workout, thought will get some more inputs there and then will fix it together.
its over and no more inputs
Comment 5 Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 09:46:28 UTC 
Created attachment 328000 [details]
patch created against glibc devel branch for Gujarati Collation fix
Comment 6 Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-31 14:58:31 UTC 
Patch is applied upstream.
Comment 7 Pravin Satpute 2009-01-02 07:17:22 UTC 
Thanks!!