Bug 468358
Summary: | execmem nota allowed, should it be? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe> |
Component: | boinc-client | Assignee: | Milos Jakubicek <xjakub> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mmahut, xjakub |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-23 21:00:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Patrick C. F. Ernzer
2008-10-24 10:33:53 UTC
Hi, I've posted this to the boinc-devel list, see the response here: http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2008-October/011948.html ...so, is it possible to extract some more detailed information (backtrace would be very nice) from SELinux? setting NEEDINFO on me until I get to run the requested trace, it will be up to three weeks though Hate it when that happens ;-) finally got around to testing this and the error simply disappeared. - Machine did a few work units on it's own - test as per Comment #1 went just fine - still boinc-client-6.2.15-1.20080818svn.fc10.x86_64 - still einstein_S5R4_6.02_i686-pc-linux-gnu_2 - newer policy though selinux-policy-targeted-3.5.13-1.fc10.noarch I suggest we close this as NOTABUG for now, I can always reopen in case it shows again. Agree, closing as NOTABUG for now. |