Bug 468465
| Summary: | Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | manuel wolfshant <manuel.wolfshant> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | manuel.wolfshant:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-02-19 19:43:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nicoleau Fabien
2008-10-24 20:36:37 UTC
Update (add desktop file) : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/posterazor.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/posterazor-1.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Rebuild under mock is OK and rpmlint is silent Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv3+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, contai
ning the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: a2959c23a3614fc7358bf73a00ec54f911396e58 PosteRazor-1.5-Source.zip
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[?] Package functions as described.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Final Notes ===
1. Would be nice to have a "touch -r" in the loop which removes the "\r"s in order to preserve the timestamps.
================
*** APPROVED ***
================
sorry, I meant: [x] Package functions as described. Thank you for the review. I'll modify the loop before import like that : for i in CHANGES LICENSE README do sed -e 's/\r//' $i > $i.tmp touch -c -r $i $i.tmp mv $i.tmp $i done ======================= New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: posterazor Short Description: Make your own poster Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: cvs done. posterazor-1.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update posterazor'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1479 posterazor-1.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update posterazor'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1506 As koji seems not closing this bug, I do it manualy. (posterazor is now in stable repository). |