Bug 468812

Summary: gpk-install-local-file says "Failed to install file"
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Masakazu Takahashi <emasaka>
Component: gnome-packagekitAssignee: Richard Hughes <richard>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: rhughes, richard
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-28 12:36:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Error dialog none

Description Masakazu Takahashi 2008-10-28 06:59:05 UTC
Created attachment 321678 [details]
Error dialog

Description of problem:

When I tries to install .rpm file by double-clicking, gpk-install-local-file says "Failed to install file".

How reproducible:

First .rpm installation of every F10 installatin.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install F10 beta or snapshot.
2. Log in to GNOME.
3. import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/*
4. Insert F10 installation media.
5. Open /Packages of installation media by Nautilus
6. Double-click .rpm file (for example, kernel-headers-*.rpm).
7. Input root password to dialog.

Actual results:

Error diaglog appears and says "Failed to install file".
See attatched image.

Expected results:

Success to install .rpm.


Additional info:

When I retry to double-click .rpm, installation of .rpm succeeds.
And after re-install F10, error happens again.

I'm using ja_JP.UTF-8 locale.  I don't know wheather it happens in other locale or not.

Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-10-28 08:28:54 UTC
what does "rpm -q PackageKit" say?

Comment 2 Masakazu Takahashi 2008-10-28 09:06:58 UTC
> what does "rpm -q PackageKit" say?

It says:

$ rpm -q PackageKit
PackageKit-0.3.8-6.fc10.i386

Comment 3 Richard Hughes 2008-10-28 09:34:25 UTC
Can you please retry with 0.3.9.

Comment 4 Masakazu Takahashi 2008-10-28 12:05:34 UTC
> Can you please retry with 0.3.9.

0.3.9 worked well!  Thanks.

Comment 5 Richard Hughes 2008-10-28 12:36:59 UTC
Thanks for the quick feedback.