Bug 469488
Summary: | Requesting Maxima 5.16.3 for F9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Smith <phhs80> |
Component: | maxima | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | jamatos, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-01 22:03:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Paul Smith
2008-11-01 13:45:35 UTC
It's my vague recollection that 5.16.3 is a beta/preview only of 5.17, but I'll have to verify... (In reply to comment #1) > It's my vague recollection that 5.16.3 is a beta/preview only of 5.17, but I'll > have to verify... Thanks, Rex. It seems to be a non-beta version: http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2008/013004.html Paul Read more closely, that release was a "release candidate" (In reply to comment #3) > Read more closely, that release was a "release candidate" You are right, Rex. I was misled by the fact that I saw Maxima 5.16.3 for F10 at Koji. I am going to close this bug. Paul I still intend on asking them for clarification... it was the last rc, and it's been awhile. |