Bug 470029
Summary: | [fix available] Can not open files through http protocol from servers that don't support "OPTIONS" | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Suqin Huang <shuang> | ||||
Component: | openoffice.org | Assignee: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | dtardon, llim | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-07 10:23:18 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Suqin Huang
2008-11-05 11:31:57 UTC
dtardon->caolanm: Was that functionality available in 2.3.0? I see it works with a url/filetype of e.g. http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/file-chooser-spec.sxw I'm not sure if this is e.g. not using/believing/knowing about the mime-type the server gives, or some other issue. reminds me of http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72068 http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/02-01Yahoo.ppt would work, but not direct from MS. Their web-server doesn't support "OPTIONS" like the old code expects, the new code uses "PROPGET" or whatever it is. Attached is a painful backport that makes this work Created attachment 322578 [details]
patch to fix
So the question is it work the risk to take this non-trivial semi-backport. We would get this for free with a 3.0 rebase and lower risk. llim->caolanm, if u feel the risk is high, then we should not include the fix for EL5. Having put the effort into backporting it I'm a little reluctant to throw that away, but it's spaghetti-like in here so I'm wary of what might go wrong. Will be good in a later release anyway. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. |