Bug 470792
Summary: | Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, oget.fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | oget.fedora:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-03 17:35:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alexander Kurtakov
2008-11-10 10:32:50 UTC
I made a quick check. There is this issue that needs to be corrected before we can do a full review: * Source0 must be given in full URL from upstream's website. A few other things that I caught were: * For the Group tag pick something from /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS Development/Tools or Development/Languages maybe? * %eclipse_base must be %define eclipse_base %{_datadir}/eclipse Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins Otherwise the package will not build. * No %doc files? Check the source thoroughly. Please list every applicable file in %doc. * Use CPL for the license * There shouldn't be both spaces and tabs in the same SPEC file. Please use one or the other. rpmlint is a good application which will warn you about such things and many other issues. Updated with the comments Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > I made a quick check. There is this issue that needs to be corrected before we > can do a full review: > > * Source0 must be given in full URL from upstream's website. Done: Fetch script added. > > > A few other things that I caught were: > > * For the Group tag pick something from > /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS > Development/Tools or Development/Languages maybe? Done: Development/Tools > > * %eclipse_base must be > %define eclipse_base %{_datadir}/eclipse > Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/EclipsePlugins > Otherwise the package will not build. Not valid for Fedora 10. > > * No %doc files? Check the source thoroughly. Please list every applicable file > in %doc. There is really no doc provided. > > * Use CPL for the license Done. > > * There shouldn't be both spaces and tabs in the same SPEC file. Please use one > or the other. rpmlint is a good application which will warn you about such > things and many other issues. Fixed. Rpmlint do not show any warning. * Whenever you are uploading a new release, don't forget the bump the release number. This applies even during the review process. * rpmlint says eclipse-shelled.noarch: W: no-documentation eclipse-shelled.src: W: strange-permission fetch-shelled.sh 0764 ** At least these files need to go to %doc. ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/license.html ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/cpl-v10.html ./com.something.eclipse.shelled.resources/about.html (Check the sample spec file at the eclipse guidelines) The other about.html files have the same content. Other than this, what are all those manpages for? ** Afaik, we use 644 for source files. * You do not need BuildRequires: zip BuildRequires: lzma * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Use the %{version} macro whenever applicable (e.g. source0). Updated : Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > * Whenever you are uploading a new release, don't forget the bump the release > number. This applies even during the review process. > > * rpmlint says > eclipse-shelled.noarch: W: no-documentation > eclipse-shelled.src: W: strange-permission fetch-shelled.sh 0764 > > ** At least these files need to go to %doc. > ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/license.html > ./com.something.eclipse.shelled-feature/cpl-v10.html > ./com.something.eclipse.shelled.resources/about.html > (Check the sample spec file at the eclipse guidelines) > The other about.html files have the same content. > Other than this, what are all those manpages for? > > ** Afaik, we use 644 for source files. Fixed. > > * You do not need > BuildRequires: zip > BuildRequires: lzma Fixed. > > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Fixed. > > * Use the %{version} macro whenever applicable (e.g. source0). Fixed. Updated : Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-shelled-1.0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm FIx %%doc handling. Thanks! Good to go. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (eclipse-shelled) has been APPROVED by oget. --------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-shelled Short Description: Eclipse Shell script editor Owners: akurtakov Branches: F-10 InitialCC: akurtakov cvs done. |