Bug 471655

Summary:	sectool depends on glibc-headers but rpm is missing dependency
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Pribyl <covex>
Component:	sectool	Assignee:	Peter Vrabec <pvrabec>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	10	CC:	dkopecek, jhrozek, pvrabec
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-01-07 09:30:14 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Adam Pribyl 2008-11-14 21:13:41 UTC

Description of problem:
Running sectool tests like passwd, group etc. checking length of names fail, becuase they do not find /usr/include/bits/utmp.h file with the constant for name length. This fail is required for correct functionality and is present in glibc-headers. This package should be dependency for sectool.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sectool-0.9.1-3.i386.rpm

Comment 1 Jakub Hrozek 2008-11-18 12:18:23 UTC

Thanks for the report, Adam, you're right. I've fixed the issue in upstream git tree.

Also bumping severity and priority, this is likely to affect end users, we should get this fixed as a 0-day-update.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2008-11-24 10:45:23 UTC

sectool-0.9.2-1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sectool-0.9.2-1

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:23:50 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2008-11-26 06:16:14 UTC

sectool-0.9.2-1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sectool'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10272

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2008-12-01 23:28:23 UTC

sectool-0.9.2-2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sectool-0.9.2-2

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2008-12-03 01:25:47 UTC

sectool-0.9.2-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sectool'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10649

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 09:29:57 UTC

sectool-0.9.2-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.