Bug 471782

Summary: Please build audacity against the system portaudio
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Component: audacityAssignee: GĂ©rard Milmeister <gemi>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: bugs.michael, dtimms, gemi
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-11-16 21:26:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kevin Kofler 2008-11-16 08:05:06 UTC
Description of problem:
I'm currently working on making PortAudio work with PulseAudio:
http://techweb.rfa.org/pipermail/portaudio/2008-November/008990.html
It would be nice if I would have just one package to patch, and especially not rebuild all of Audacity just to test my changes. Unfortunately, Audacity is currently built against a private copy of PortAudio.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
audacity-0:1.3.5-0.7.beta.fc9

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check dependencies of Audacity.
  
Actual results:
Uses private PortAudio.

Expected results:
Uses system PortAudio.

Additional info:
Using private copies of system libraries is also against our packaging guidelines. I understand this was needed when Audacity required PortAudio v19 and the system copy was only v18, but the system copy is also v19 now.

Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2008-11-16 08:07:18 UTC
See also https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162 against audacity-freeworld.

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2008-11-16 08:50:12 UTC
WONTFIX and CANTFIX. We are aware of the "portaudio" package.
The included PortAudio is built with because it is both a snapshot
from svn and patched for Audacity (also to support PortMixer).

Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2008-11-16 21:26:27 UTC
Well, OK then. I still think ultimately the changes should get into PortAudio upstream, but I see not much can be done for now.

I will file bugs to merge my PulseAudio (or rather: ALSA without dmix) patches instead (once I tested them to actually work).

Comment 4 Kevin Kofler 2008-11-16 21:27:00 UTC
I mean "ALSA without mmap" of course, not "without dmix".