Bug 472071

Summary:	Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bryan Kearney <bkearney>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Fabian Affolter <mail>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, mail, notting, pbrobinson, smparrish
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-01-25 20:45:22 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	462625

Description Bryan Kearney 2008-11-18 16:27:58 UTC

Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint.spec
SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint-23-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Draw activity for Sugar. This is the first package I have done compiling C Code. Please review the use of make.

Comment 1 Fabian Affolter 2008-11-19 08:48:54 UTC

In another review request Marco suggested to check if 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}' in the %build section is actually necessary because setup.py takes care of it.

Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2008-11-19 13:54:08 UTC

You are correct. New versions added:

Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint.spec
SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint-23-2.fc9.src.rpm

Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 10:50:17 UTC

I will do a full review as soon as my F10 system is ready.

Comment 4 Fabian Affolter 2009-01-24 20:14:18 UTC

Scratch build failed:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079887

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2009-01-26 14:28:44 UTC

This is due (I think) to the conversion to the new python. The build works on dist-f10, but not for target dist-f11. I will dig into this a bit more.

Comment 6 Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-27 00:26:58 UTC

Bryan where do we stand on this.  Do you have a working version for F11?  Do you need help or someone to take over?

Steven

Comment 7 Peter Robinson 2010-01-25 20:45:22 UTC

Closing this. There has been no response from the packager since F-10 which in itself it now retired. Please open a new Review if someone wants to pick this up.