Bug 472229 (PyQwt)
| Summary: | Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tadej Janež <tadej.j> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | cz172638, fedora-package-review, itamar, mtasaka, neteler, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mtasaka:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.1.0-4.fc9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-02-01 13:00:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Tadej Janež
2008-11-19 14:38:57 UTC
I forgot to mention that this is my first package and I need a sponsor. Some notes:
* BuildRequires/Requires
- build.log shows
------------------------------------------------------------
80 Failed to import numarray: PyQwt will be build without support for numarray.
81 Failed to find Numeric2: PyQwt will be build without support for Numeric.
.....
86 'disable_numarray': False,
87 'disable_numeric': False,
88 'disable_numpy': False,
------------------------------------------------------------
These message seems contradictory.
Perhaps "BuildRequires: python-numarray python-numeric"
is needed.
- Also please check if numpy (or python-numarray, python-numeric)
are also needed for "Requires" (not BuildRequires).
For python module related packages, writing a package in
"BuildRequires" does not mean that the package is installed
at runtime.
- And check if PyQwt-devel does not require "qwt-devel".
For example, QwtList.sip contains:
-------------------------------------------------------------
34 %MappedType QList<QwtPickerMachine::Command>
35 {
36 %TypeHeaderCode
37 #include <qlist.h>
38 #include <qwt_picker_machine.h>
39 %End
-------------------------------------------------------------
* Timestamps
- 'INSTALL="install -p"' argument to "make install" does not
make sense for this package because this makefile is not
based on autotools but based on python
(actually when installing files "cp -f" is used)
* Permission of scripts
-------------------------------------------------------------
# non-executable script
chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/PyQt4/Qwt5/grace.py
-------------------------------------------------------------
- If this script is not meant to be called directly by
users (but is meant to be called internally from programs
or so), then this script should not have executable
permission and the shebang should be removed.
ping? Firstly, thank you for taking the time to review my package and I apologize for not responding to your review earlier. (In reply to comment #2) > Some notes: > > * BuildRequires/Requires > - build.log shows > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 80 Failed to import numarray: PyQwt will be build without support for > numarray. > 81 Failed to find Numeric2: PyQwt will be build without support for > Numeric. > ..... > 86 'disable_numarray': False, > 87 'disable_numeric': False, > 88 'disable_numpy': False, > ------------------------------------------------------------ > These message seems contradictory. > Perhaps "BuildRequires: python-numarray python-numeric" > is needed. I would prefer to avoid all this and just disable support for Numarray and Numeric at configure stage. As far as I know, Numpy is deemed as a replacement for both Numarray and Numeric. > - Also please check if numpy (or python-numarray, python-numeric) > are also needed for "Requires" (not BuildRequires). > For python module related packages, writing a package in > "BuildRequires" does not mean that the package is installed > at runtime. Yes, it is definitely needed at run time, so I added it to "Requires". > - And check if PyQwt-devel does not require "qwt-devel". > For example, QwtList.sip contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 34 %MappedType QList<QwtPickerMachine::Command> > 35 { > 36 %TypeHeaderCode > 37 #include <qlist.h> > 38 #include <qwt_picker_machine.h> > 39 %End > ------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, you are right. I added qwt-devel to PyQwt-devel's "Requires". > * Timestamps > - 'INSTALL="install -p"' argument to "make install" does not > make sense for this package because this makefile is not > based on autotools but based on python > (actually when installing files "cp -f" is used) I don't completely understand how (not) using autotools affects the use of "install -p" option, but I trust you that it is not necessary. > > * Permission of scripts > ------------------------------------------------------------- > # non-executable script > chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/PyQt4/Qwt5/grace.py > ------------------------------------------------------------- > - If this script is not meant to be called directly by > users (but is meant to be called internally from programs > or so), then this script should not have executable > permission and the shebang should be removed. grace.py could be executed directly but it requires 'grace' package to work. If the user doesn't have it installed, it just crashes with an error that 'xmgrace' is not found. However, it seems bloated to me to add a new 'Requires: grace' just because some example script needs it. Also, upstream is a bit confusing about executable scripts, because a similar example script qplt.py could also have a shebang at the top and be made executable but it doesn't have it. I made grace.py executable because I received warning messages from rpmlint and I decided that would be the simplest solution. Maybe it is better to make all example scripts consistent and non-executable? If so, I should remove the shebang from grace.py. Updated spec file and source package are at http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/ Well, for 5.1.0-2:
* Header files dependency:
- Well, for example the installed QwtModule.sip contains:
----------------------------------------------------------------
63 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayDouble.h>
64 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayInt.h>
65 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoubleInterval.h>
66 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoublePoint.h>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
However these header files are not installed. Would
you check if these are ignored?
* About grace.py
- Well, I checked this file again and actually this file is
executable, so it is more correct that this script should simply
have 0755 permission (while for qplt.py it seems that
this script cannot be executed directly).
Then:
-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:
This package will be accepted with another few work.
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate)
must sponsor you.
Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally.
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you)
are required to "show that you have an understanding
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
(at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
a formal review)
When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report
so that I can check your comments or review request.
Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
(NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review")
Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------
ping? ping again? Thank you for taking time to review my fixed package! And I apologize again for responding so late. (In reply to comment #5) > Well, for 5.1.0-2: > > * Header files dependency: > - Well, for example the installed QwtModule.sip contains: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 63 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayDouble.h> > 64 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayInt.h> > 65 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoubleInterval.h> > 66 #include <sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoublePoint.h> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > However these header files are not installed. Would > you check if these are ignored? I traced what is happening to these files. configure/configure.py in PyQwt-5.1.0.tar.gz contains: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 745 # FIXME: sip-4.7 does not generate those include files anymore 746 for name in [os.path.join(tmp_dir, name) for name in [ 747 'sipQwtQwtArrayDouble.h', 748 'sipQwtQwtArrayInt.h', 749 'sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoubleInterval.h', 750 'sipQwtQwtArrayQwtDoublePoint.h', 751 ]]: 752 if not os.path.exists(name): 753 open(name, 'w') --------------------------------------------------------------------- So these files get created after running 'python configure.py ...', however, they remain empty. Furthermore 'make install' doesn't install them anywhere, which would indicate that they are obsolete. I think this is an issue that should be handled upstream. I submitted a bug in sourceforge.net bug tracker: https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2534030&group_id=82987&atid=567933 UPDATE: The author of the package responded that this was a rudimentary hack to maintain backwards compatibility with older SIP versions and he will remove it in future versions of the package. > * About grace.py > - Well, I checked this file again and actually this file is > executable, so it is more correct that this script should simply > have 0755 permission (while for qplt.py it seems that > this script cannot be executed directly). OK, made grace.py executable again. > Then: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. I would be very glad if you could sponsor me. > When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other > person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report > so that I can check your comments or review request. Ok, I did a pre-review of python-webunit package, which is tracked at bug 481272. Please check its quality and instruct me on my next steps. I also uploaded updated spec file and source package at http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/ Okay. - This package itself is now good - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments ---------------------------------------------------- This package (PyQwt) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. OK, thanks for sponsoring me! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PyQwt Short Description: Python bindings for Qwt Owners: tadej Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: cvs done. Closing. PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc10 PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: PyQwt New Branches: el6 Owners: tadej Git done (by process-git-requests). Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: PyQwt New Branches: epel7 Owners: tadej (In reply to Jiri Kastner from comment #19) > Package Change Request > ====================== > Package Name: PyQwt > New Branches: epel7 > Owners: tadej I have opened a new request for this at #1204451 |