Bug 472349

Summary:	Upgrade of amanda leaves behind /etc/xinetd.d/amanda.usernameupdate file, confuses chkconfig, system-config-services
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nils Philippsen <nphilipp>
Component:	amanda	Assignee:	Daniel Novotny <dnovotny>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dnovotny
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-11-20 13:10:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nils Philippsen 2008-11-20 11:23:55 UTC

Description of problem:
Upgrading amanda left an /etc/xinetd.d/amanda.usernameupdate file which confuses chkconfig, system-config-services (it gets treated as its own service, while it's only a backup file).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
amanda-2.6.0p2-3.fc10.x86_64

How reproducible:
Reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade amanda while /etc/xinetd.d/amanda contains old "amanda" username
  
Actual results:
/etc/xinetd.d/amanda.usernameupdate exists

Expected results:
Use /etc/xinetd.d/amanda.rpmsave as the backup file, so chkconfig and tools that use it will ignore the file.

Comment 1 Nils Philippsen 2008-11-20 11:30:16 UTC

To illustrate:

nils@wombat:~> chkconfig --list  | grep amanda
	amanda:        	off
	amanda.usernameupdate:	off

Comment 2 Daniel Novotny 2008-11-20 13:10:27 UTC

okay, extension changed to .rpmsave
fixed in amanda-2.6.0p2-4.fc11