Bug 472795

Summary: ppc64: missing compat sys_ustat corrupts userspace when sys_ustat called from 32-bit
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Component: kernelAssignee: Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 10CC: jwboyer, kernel-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ppc64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-15 03:11:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eric Sandeen 2008-11-24 17:32:52 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #472426 +++

Found this by running a 32-bit xfs_logprint on a 64-bit kernel:

# xfs_logprint /dev/loop0
xfs_logprint:
*** stack smashing detected ***: xfs_logprint terminated
Aborted (core dumped)

The problem here is that there is no sys_compat_ustat, and the kernel copies out a structure larger than userspace has provided:

32-bit ustat struct from userspace:

struct ustat {
        __daddr_t                  f_tfree;              /*     0     4 */
        __ino_t                    f_tinode;             /*     4     4 */
        char                       f_fname[6];           /*     8     6 */
        char                       f_fpack[6];           /*    14     6 */

        /* size: 20, cachelines: 1 */
        /* last cacheline: 20 bytes */
};

kernel ustat struct:

struct ustat {
        __kernel_daddr_t           f_tfree;              /*     0     4 */

        /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */

        __kernel_ino_t             f_tinode;             /*     8     8 */
        char                       f_fname[6];           /*    16     6 */
        char                       f_fpack[6];           /*    22     6 */

        /* size: 32, cachelines: 1 */
        /* sum members: 24, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
        /* padding: 4 */
        /* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
};

... so userspace is corrupted when this syscall is called.

Christoph Hellwig mentioned that he might take a stab at fixing it, since he's done other compat syscalls, but not sure on what schedule, so perhaps I (or our ppc maintainer, if we have one...?) can take a look at the fix.

--- Additional comment from esandeen on 2008-11-20 15:12:27 EDT ---

See also http://rhts.redhat.com/cgi-bin/rhts/test_log.cgi?id=5087037

--- Additional comment from esandeen on 2008-11-20 22:00:46 EDT ---

I've tested the patch in comment #3 on ppc, and it resolves the issue I saw.

Comment 1 Eric Sandeen 2008-11-24 17:33:50 UTC
Christoph Hellwig whipped up a patch for this:

[PATCH] generic compat_sys_ustat went to LKML on 11/21

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:52:39 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2009-11-18 08:57:19 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 10.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '10'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 4 Eric Sandeen 2009-12-15 03:11:50 UTC
This is all upstream now.