Bug 473182
| Summary: | Conflict with tk-tktreectrl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> |
| Component: | tcl-tktreectrl | Assignee: | Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mcepl, mcepl, tcallawa, wart |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-12-20 19:00:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Looks like the same package as tk-tktreectrl, but with the correct naming per the Tcl packaging guidelines (which were adopted after tk-tktreectrl was already imported). I'm happy to let spot maintain the real package, and dump tk-tktreectrl. I'd only request that tcl-tktreectrl also Provides: tk-tktreectrl. There is nothing to triage here. Switching to ASSIGNED so that developers have responsibility to do whatever they want to do with it. (In reply to comment #1) > Looks like the same package as tk-tktreectrl, but with the correct naming per > the Tcl packaging guidelines (which were adopted after tk-tktreectrl was > already imported). > > I'm happy to let spot maintain the real package, and dump tk-tktreectrl. I'd > only request that tcl-tktreectrl also Provides: tk-tktreectrl. It already has that Provides. :) Can you go ahead and EOL your package? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/RetiredPackages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife (In reply to comment #1) > Looks like the same package as tk-tktreectrl, but with the correct naming per > the Tcl packaging guidelines (which were adopted after tk-tktreectrl was > already imported). Apologies on causing the duplication in the first place, I'm usually better at catching this sort of thing. (In reply to comment #3) > It already has that Provides. :) Can you go ahead and EOL your package? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/RetiredPackages > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife I'll do this as soon as I get a real network connection back (hopefully tomorrow). Feel free to add me to a comaintainer of this package if you'd like. (In reply to comment #5) > I'll do this as soon as I get a real network connection back (hopefully > tomorrow). Feel free to add me to a comaintainer of this package if you'd > like. Friendly reminder: This has not yet been done. If you want to comaintain tcl-tktreectrl, just request it at the PackageDB and I will approve it. I've updated CVS for tk-tktreectrl and file a releng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1198 I just noticed that this conflict also applies to F8, F9, and F10. I'll go ahead and mark tk-tktreectrl as EOL on these three branches as well. I've marked the F-9 and F-10 branches as EOL and requested them to be blocked: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1204 Shouldn't tcl-tktreectrl also contain "Obsoletes: tk-tktreectrl < %{version}-%{release}"? Otherwise 'yum install tktreectrl will still pick up the EOL'd tk-tktreectrl, even though it has an older version (at least that's what happened in my testing) Well, we can't do it like that, because tcl-tktreectrl has a macroed versioned Provides for tk-treectrl. It would obsolete itself. We could add Obsoletes for the last V-R that tk-tktreectrl released, which seems to be 2.2.3-5: Obsoletes: tk-tktreectrl <= 2.2.3-5 Good point. I've fixed this in tcl-tktreectrl cvs. If it looks right to you then I'll tag and build, then apply the same changes to F-10 and F-9. Looks fine. tk-tktreectrl has been marked EOL, and a new build for tcl-tktreectrl has been built for rawhide. Updates to F-10 and F-9 are pending. Closing. |
tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc9.i386 in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: tk-tktreectrl-2.2.3-5.fc9.i386 /usr/share/man/mann/treectrl.n.gz (and vice versa) Looks like it is the same software. Review Fauxpas?