Bug 473451

Summary: Update jruby to latest upstream ver 1.1.5
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christian Nolte <ch.nolte>
Component: jrubyAssignee: Conrad Meyer <cse.cem+redhatbugz>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: cse.cem+redhatbugz
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-30 23:34:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 467029, 473530, 473537    
Bug Blocks: 480653    

Description Christian Nolte 2008-11-28 15:55:34 UTC
On Nov. 3rd ver. 1.1.5 of jruby has been released. Please update the package to this version.

Comment 1 Conrad Meyer 2008-11-29 04:42:27 UTC
It seems each release of jruby introduces new dependencies (sort of, half of them are just things that used to be part of jruby and have since split off as "independent" projects). This particular release at least one new dependency has been introduced, which is not yet in Fedora. So I'm depending this bug on the review request for that one.

Comment 2 Conrad Meyer 2008-11-29 07:14:20 UTC
Another new dep: jcodings.

Comment 3 Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 01:43:53 UTC
Fedora 1.1.6 and dependencies are now in Rawhide. Want to test this and close it?

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-03-09 23:09:02 UTC
jruby-1.1.6-1.fc10, joni-1.1.2-1.fc10, bytelist-1.0.1-0.1.svn9177.fc10, jcodings-1.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Christian Nolte 2009-03-16 12:49:55 UTC
Thanks for upgrading jruby! Any chance you can push this to F9 too? We would need joni-1.1.2 though, too.

Comment 6 Conrad Meyer 2009-03-16 14:37:29 UTC
My rationale for *not* pushing jruby-1.1.5+ to F-9 is that I'm fairly sure there are dependencies of jruby-1.1.5+ that F-9 doesn't have (and that are out of my control). (Dependencies jruby-1.1.3, the version in F-9, doesn't require.)

Comment 7 Conrad Meyer 2009-03-21 00:05:03 UTC
I think the original issue this bug report addressed has been resolved, is it ok with you if we close this? Thanks.

Comment 8 Conrad Meyer 2009-04-30 23:34:36 UTC
Closing, please reopen if you have more (related) concerns.