Bug 473734

Summary:	openjdk renders incorrectly for jeuclid
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Brennan Ashton <bashton>
Component:	java-1.6.0-openjdk	Assignee:	Lillian Angel <langel>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	9	CC:	dbhole, langel, lkundrak, mjw, mjw
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-12-01 06:57:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	472848

Description Brennan Ashton 2008-11-30 05:01:53 UTC

I know this is not going to be a helpful initial bug report, as I do not even fully understand what the issue is.  I am packaging up jeuclid for fedora and I have it compiling fine with openjdk, the issue is that the images that are being rendered are all messed up.  This works with sun jdk.

here is the srpm:
http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-3.1.3-8.fc9.src.rpm

you just need jeuclid and jeuclid-mathviewer
The launcher script:

#!/bin/bash
. /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions

MAIN_CLASS=net.sourceforge.jeuclid.app.mathviewer.MathViewer

set_classpath "commons-logging commons-cli commons-lang fop jcip-annotations xml
graphics-commons batik-all jeuclid-core jeuclid-mathviewer commons-io"

run "$@"


Here is the test data that can be pasted in: http://jeuclid.sourceforge.net/example5.html as well as a correct rendering.  What I get with openjdk is:

http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/example5.png

If there is anything else I can provide that will help, just ask.  I really did not know what to put in this report.

Comment 1 Mark Wielaard 2008-11-30 10:55:40 UTC

Could you retry with the version in Fedora 10? There were some font metric calculation fixes recently, and I believe those did already go into the F10 package.

Comment 2 Brennan Ashton 2008-12-01 06:57:18 UTC

Looks great on 10, I had not gotten around to getting a 10 box up.

Comment 3 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-01 10:28:10 UTC

Will this fix be propagated to F-9?

Comment 4 Brennan Ashton 2008-12-02 00:27:37 UTC

upstream would also like to know when it was fixed?  Is is the correct bug?
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jdk/rev/9cdababf6179

Comment 5 Mark Wielaard 2008-12-02 07:19:43 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> upstream would also like to know when it was fixed?  Is is the correct bug?
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jdk/rev/9cdababf6179

That is one of the font patches I applied upstream to icedtea yes:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2008-November/003896.html
That one in particular was for upstream bug:
http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227