Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||After using preupgrade for f9->f10, fedora.repo should not be updated?|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||András Szilárd <andras.szilard>|
|Component:||preupgrade||Assignee:||Seth Vidal <skvidal>|
|Status:||CLOSED DUPLICATE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-12-05 16:12:32 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description András Szilárd 2008-11-30 11:38:52 EST
Description of problem: After (yum update, yum install preupgrade,) preupgrade the /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo was not updated to the Fedora 10 repository. Only "Fedora 10 - x86_64 - Updates" was available. Should not that repo file be updated? The "original" problem can be seen here: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qa preupgrade preupgrade-1.0.0-1.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Did not try. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: F10 repository should be added after preupgrade? Additional info: I could not really find what the Fedora 10 repo supposed to be. Smart Package Manager gave me some hints, but it did not updated the repo file, even though I accepted the proposed changes. Finally, I updated the fedora.repo file manually.
Comment 1 Will Woods 2008-12-05 14:12:31 EST
Do you have a file named /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo.rpmnew? If you customized/modified your fedora.repo, the upgrade will leave it alone. If that file exists, copy it over /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo and everything should be OK. (See bug 471579)
Comment 2 András Szilárd 2008-12-05 16:05:28 EST
Yes, I have modified the repo file (in July), and the repo.rpmnew file seems to be fine. The new repo file does not contain the exact release and arch, but parameters. So, I guess, this will not be an issue anymore. Thanks, and let me know if you want to check anything else.