Bug 474077

Summary: syntax highlighting bug in java code samples for "number"
Product: [Community] Publican Reporter: Dana Mison <dmison>
Component: publicanAssignee: Jeff Fearn <jfearn>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Content Services Development <ecs-dev-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 2.0CC: mmcallis, publican-list
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: 0.40 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-09 21:22:47 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Dana Mison 2008-12-01 19:52:18 EST
Description of problem:
Identifies numeric constants but doesn't know how to mark them up & leaves <xslthl> tags around them.  Similar to Bugzilla #472500

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1 - specify language="java" for a programlisting containing numeric constants. 
Doesn't matter if it is inline code or included via xi:include 

<programlisting language="java">i = 5;</programlisting>

Actual results:
i = <xslthl:number>5</xslthl:number>;

Expected results:
i = 5;
Comment 1 Jeff Fearn 2008-12-09 21:22:47 EST
Added handling for number and doccomment.
Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 02:40:23 EST
publican-fedora-0.17-0.fc10,publican-0.40-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 02:43:05 EST
publican-fedora-0.17-0.fc9,publican-0.40-0.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:32:36 EST
publican-fedora-0.17-0.fc10, publican-0.40-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 5 Dana Mison 2009-02-02 20:43:38 EST
This is manifesting itself in 0.41.  I never built these docs with 0.40, this may be a regression.