Bug 474723
Summary: | Add GTC Support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jacob Hunt <jhunt> |
Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Dan Williams <dcbw> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | dcbw, ormandj, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-02-18 11:18:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jacob Hunt
2008-12-05 00:07:19 UTC
I also have noticed this issue. I have filed a bug on the Gnome bugtracker, for NetworkManager: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565065 ----------- Hi, I am trying to use Fedora 10/Intel 5300 on a Aruba based wireless network, which uses GTC for the inner authentication. I see this option no longer exists in the version of NM that I have: NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.12.svn4326.fc10.x86_64. Out of curiosity, I used GIT to get the latest source (as of Dec. 18, 2008), and see the following in libnm-util/nm-setting-8021x.c: 950 { "gtc", NULL, NULL }, // FIXME: implement So, it appears GTC is not implemented in NM, even though wpa_supplicant supports it. Are there any patches available that allow this to work? This seems to be a regression from version 0.6.x (I don't know the exact version I was using before). Seeing this comment in the source, it seems to be a known issue. I'm filing it here as it appears to be in NM proper, not just the distribution specific version I have. Is the lack of GTC actually the case, and will this be implemented? Are there any known workarounds other than not using NM? Respectfully, David ----------- This is a relatively common inner authentication option for businesses, support would be highly appreciated! Cheers, David *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 451027 *** |