Bug 475038
Summary: | Package Request for pidgin-sipe plugin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stefan Becker <chemobejk> |
Component: | pidgin | Assignee: | Warren Togami <wtogami> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | stu, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://sipe.sourceforge.net/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-07 23:11:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stefan Becker
2008-12-06 21:26:07 UTC
Respectfully, I do not do plugin packages, and especially do not do packages for things that I personally do not use. They have a habit of stagnating or becoming broken if the maintainer themself does not use the package. If you find someone else to maintain this package in Fedora then it can happen. Even *you* could maintain the package in Fedora without a significant amount of effort. If you aim this to be part of RHEL, you need to go through customer support channels to make a formal product request. It will not happen without business justification and assigned resources. I'm wondering if you would be willing to pick up the review for package request for pidgin-sipe: bug #512170. The SIPE project has made major improvements during the last six months, feature-wise and quality-wise. I'm confident that pidgin-sipe is now developed/stable enough for inclusion into Fedora AND EPEL. Several of my colleagues and myself have it in active daily use without major problems. |