Bug 475243
Summary: | malformed BuildRequire entries (versioning has parentheses) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | R P Herrold <herrold> |
Component: | R2spec | Assignee: | Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | pingou |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-09 14:23:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
R P Herrold
2008-12-08 16:59:58 UTC
This is not a bug but a RFE :D R2spec takes its information from the DESCRIPTION files in the sources whatever way they are written I was thinking about it and the "(", ")" can be removed easily. It becomes harder for libraries in BR ie: in the example you are giving stats should be R-stats but R should remain R and if the package depends on other software they should also not be presented as R-name... Needs probably some though Thanks for all your feedback :) The model I am following of course, is a traditional one: 1. get it written (you did) 2. get it into Fedora ... we did 3. get it working accurately ... we are in process 4. [optional] get it fast ;) 13:42 orc_orc> I am about 1/2 way thru autopackaging 1600 CRAN with R2spec converter this morning really as I write this 1648 overall, and I am a 1283 (ref_0.95.tar.gz) My next step (once the first pass auto-spec is done) is an automated: rpmbuild -ba (specfile) for all to identify errors in grammar in the 'spec file language .. I see some, already but will feed the next clocker, in turn, to you. and then the step after that is to manually post process solutions for certain leaf nodes I want, to identify needed automated cleanup My intention is to keep feeding you 'easyfix' matters ... I hope this is acceptable. with my best regards, -- Russ herrold |