Bug 475297

Summary: gmp does not build shared library libmpfr.so*
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Chris Schanzle <bugzilla>
Component: gmpAssignee: Frantisek Kluknavsky <fkluknav>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.2CC: ovasik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-08 12:49:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to gmp.spec none

Description Chris Schanzle 2008-12-08 20:16:12 UTC
Created attachment 326175 [details]
patch to gmp.spec

Description of problem:
missing libmpfr.so, only libmpfr.a is available

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gmp-4.1.4-10.el5.i386

Suggested patch to .spec file is attached.
Note patch includes %{dist} -> %{?dist} fix, reported elsewhere.

Comment 1 Chris Schanzle 2009-05-13 15:24:41 UTC
Hello, anyone there?

Comment 2 Chris Schanzle 2010-06-29 01:33:32 UTC
[year passes...]

Comment 3 Ondrej Vasik 2010-12-16 14:51:47 UTC
If you want to increase priority for that update, please contact Red Hat Product support, bugzilla is not a support tool, it is just bug tracking tool for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Without escalation on support it is very unlikely this will be fixed in RHEL-5.

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2011-05-31 14:16:07 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the
current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this
request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support
representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant,
in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2011-09-23 00:31:32 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the
current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this
request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support
representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant,
in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2012-06-12 01:16:17 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the
current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this
request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support
representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant,
in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 7 Frantisek Kluknavsky 2013-03-08 12:49:24 UTC
I am sorry, but it is now too late in the RHEL-5 release cycle.
RHEL-5.10 (the next RHEL-5 minor release) is going to be the first
production phase 2 [1] release of RHEL-5. Since phase 2 we'll be
addressing only security and critical issues.
This issue is fixed in RHEL-6 therefore I am closing the bug as
NEXTRELEASE.

[1] https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/